Phenomenology and Ethnomethodology
Introduction
Phenomenology and ethnomethodology explore how people create and maintain social order in their daily lives. Phenomenology, developed by Edmund Husserl and Alfred Schutz, looks at how individuals use shared knowledge to make sense of the world. Ethnomethodology, introduced by Harold Garfinkel, focuses on the methods people use to keep social interactions organized, often revealed by breaking social norms. These approaches highlight how meaning and order are built and maintained in everyday life.
Phenomenology: Imposing Order on the World
Phenomenology, developed by Edmund Husserl and later expanded by Alfred Schutz, explores how individuals impose meaning and order on their experiences. Husserl argued that the world becomes comprehensible because people construct mental categories to organize sensory information. For example, when entering a classroom, you recognize it as a place for learning because of accumulated experiences and societal norms, such as the presence of desks, a whiteboard, and a teacher. These mental categories allow us to interpret the environment quickly and effectively.
The Lifeworld and Shared Understanding
Alfred Schutz built on Husserl’s work by introducing the concept of the lifeworld, which refers to the shared stock of common-sense knowledge that individuals use to navigate their daily lives. The lifeworld consists of assumptions, social norms, and shared meanings that help people interact predictably and coherently. For instance, in a classroom, students and teachers share the understanding that raising a hand signals a desire to speak. These shared norms are not formally taught but are learned through socialization and are critical for smooth interactions.
A modern example of the lifeworld is the use of emojis in digital communication. Emojis, such as a thumbs-up (👍) or a smiley face (😊), are widely understood symbols that convey approval or happiness without needing further explanation. These symbols demonstrate how shared meanings make interactions efficient and meaningful, even in virtual spaces.
Typifications: Categorizing the Social World
Schutz also introduced the idea of typifications, which are mental shortcuts or categories individuals use to organize their understanding of people, objects, and events. Typifications simplify the complexities of social life by allowing individuals to classify their experiences based on prior knowledge. For instance, when someone sees a person in a white coat with a stethoscope, they typically assume the individual is a doctor. This assumption enables people to interact without requiring detailed explanations or verifications.
Typifications also help individuals navigate new situations by applying familiar categories. For example, when entering a restaurant for the first time, you rely on typifications about how dining out typically works—expecting to be seated, given a menu, and served food.
Recipe Knowledge: Everyday Routines
Another key concept in phenomenology is recipe knowledge, which refers to the practical, taken-for-granted knowledge people use to manage routine activities without much thought. Schutz compared this to following a recipe in cooking—after repeated practice, the process becomes automatic. For example, most people know how to board a bus: they line up, pay their fare, and find a seat without consciously thinking through each step. Recipe knowledge ensures that mundane tasks are performed efficiently and predictably.
The Natural Attitude: Assuming Order in the World
The natural attitude is the unspoken assumption that the world is orderly and predictable. It allows people to act without constantly questioning the reality or legitimacy of their experiences. For instance, when using public transport, individuals assume that the bus schedule is accurate and the driver knows the route. These assumptions are rarely questioned unless something disrupts the routine, such as a delayed bus or an unexpected detour.
Ethnomethodology
Ethnomethodology, developed by Harold Garfinkel, is a sociological approach that examines how individuals create and sustain social order through their everyday interactions and shared practices. While phenomenology focuses on the internal mental processes behind meaning-making, ethnomethodology is concerned with the practical actions and routines that individuals use to establish and maintain a sense of order. By uncovering the implicit rules and assumptions that govern behaviour in social contexts, ethnomethodology reveals how order is actively constructed in everyday life.
Breaching Experiments: Revealing Hidden Norms
One of Garfinkel’s key contributions to ethnomethodology was his use of breaching experiments. These experiments involve deliberately disrupting social norms to observe how individuals respond and attempt to restore normalcy. Breaching experiments highlight the often-unspoken rules that guide social interactions and reveal the reflexive practices people use to sustain order.
Examples of Breaching Experiments
-
Family as Strangers
In one experiment, Garfinkel instructed students to act as lodgers in their own homes. They were told to treat their families as strangers or hotel staff by asking permission to use shared spaces, speaking formally, and avoiding personal interactions. This behavior confused and frustrated family members, who struggled to make sense of the disruption and often rationalized it as stress or another plausible explanation. -
Haggling in Supermarkets
Another breaching experiment involved asking participants to haggle over prices in supermarkets, violating the unspoken norm that grocery prices are fixed. Store employees and customers reacted with confusion or irritation, attempting to reconcile this unexpected behaviour with their understanding of appropriate shopping practices.
These experiments demonstrate that when norms are breached, individuals actively work to interpret and justify the behaviour to restore a sense of normalcy. For example, they might rationalize unusual behaviour as the result of external factors, such as stress or cultural differences, rather than recognizing it as a deliberate challenge to social conventions.
Reflexivity: Sustaining Social Order
A central concept in ethnomethodology is reflexivity, which refers to the process by which individuals use shared knowledge and assumptions to interpret situations and maintain social order. Reflexivity allows people to make sense of ambiguous or unexpected behaviors by linking them to familiar contexts or explanations.
For instance, if a colleague acts unusually in a meeting—speaking out of turn or appearing overly emotional—others might attribute this behavior to fatigue or stress rather than questioning the fundamental rules of professional conduct. Reflexivity helps individuals navigate disruptions, reinforcing the shared understanding that underpins social interactions.
Reflexivity is essential for the continuous production of social order, as it enables individuals to apply common-sense reasoning to make sense of the world. This process ensures stability and coherence, even in the face of unpredictable or disruptive events.
Indexicality: Context-Dependence of Meaning
Another key idea in ethnomethodology is indexicality, which emphasizes that the meaning of actions, words, or behaviour's depends on the context in which they occur. Meaning is not fixed but is continuously interpreted and reinterpreted based on situational factors.
Examples of Indexicality
- The phrase “Can you pass the salt?” is typically understood as a polite request during a meal but might seem confusing or out of place in a business meeting.
- Laughing loudly might signal enjoyment at a comedy show but would be considered inappropriate at a solemn event like a funeral.
Indexicality demonstrates that social interactions rely heavily on contextual cues. Individuals use reflexive practices to clarify ambiguous meanings and respond appropriately, ensuring that interactions remain coherent.
Ethnomethodology and Social Order
Through the concepts of reflexivity and indexicality, ethnomethodology explains how social order is not a pre-existing structure but an ongoing process actively constructed through interaction. Social order emerges as individuals work to make sense of their environment, negotiate shared meanings, and adhere to implicit norms.
For example, in public spaces, people unconsciously follow rules such as forming queues, maintaining personal space, and exchanging polite greetings. These norms are not formally enforced but are upheld through mutual understanding and reflexive practices. When these norms are violated—such as when someone cuts in line—others often respond to restore order, either through direct confrontation or subtle gestures like disapproving looks.
EVALUATION
While phenomenology and ethnomethodology provide valuable insights into the construction of social reality, they face significant criticisms.
- Lack of Depth: Critics argue that these approaches often describe processes of meaning-making without offering deeper explanations for why these processes occur. For instance, while ethnomethodology highlights how shared meanings are sustained, it does not explain the origins of these meanings or the factors that influence them.
- Overemphasis on Micro-Level Processes: These theories focus heavily on individual interactions, often neglecting the role of broader social structures and inequalities. Marxists, for example, contend that shared meanings are shaped by ruling-class ideology, which is disseminated through institutions like the media, education, and religion to maintain the status quo.
- Limited Practical Application: Breaching experiments, while illuminating, have been criticized for their artificiality and triviality. Critics like Margaret Carey argue that such experiments uncover little beyond the obvious, as most people are already aware of the social norms they follow.